In his piece in The Value, the guy said classical-neoclassical-or-whatever sort of economist has a sacred view about savings preceding investment.
It is actually the contrary, dear sir. Modern economists in the tradition u despise think precisely the opposite: productivity shocks increase rates of return which in turn attracts savings, either domestic or foreign (I myself do not fully buy this, let me be clear)
Why Belluzer is ALWAYS saying stupid things? Why people let him publish these lamentable articles??
Go figure...but the important thing is that I am vigilant. Beware of Economist X, Belluzer!!!